MURMUR READING GUIDE · GLOSSARY

The 369 method
How it works, who made it, and what it can’t do.

The steps, a worked example, a dated history that starts well before TikTok, and an honest read of the research.

By Ju, co-founder of MurMur · Updated

The 369 method is a manifestation ritual: you write one short statement 3 times in the morning, 6 times in the afternoon and 9 times before bed, usually for three to six weeks. It is widely credited to Nikola Tesla, but the earliest dated version we found is an October 2019 YouTube video by law-of-attraction coach Karin Yee, who says she made it up herself.

Watercolor of three rows of smooth pebbles, like the 369 method’s three rounds, on a wooden desk beside an open notebook and a pen.
Three, six, nine: a rhythm, not a formula.

What is the 369 method? How to do it, step by step

People also call it the 369 manifestation method, the 3-6-9 method or Tesla 369. Despite the name, nobody writes anything 369 times: 3 + 6 + 9 comes to 18 lines a day, hung on waking up, lunch and bedtime.

Yee’s 2019 version, which many explainers still copy:

  • Write one statement, usually opening with thanks and long enough to take more than 17 seconds to write. That borrows a “17-second rule” attributed to Abraham-Hicks.
  • Morning: write it 3 times soon after you wake.
  • Afternoon: 6 times, around lunch.
  • Night: 9 times right before sleep. Yee’s instruction is to get into the feeling of it, then let it go.
  • Keep going for a set run. Yee suggested 33 or 45 days. Others say 21, or as long as it feels good.

If you’d rather not count on your fingers, our free 369 method tracker keeps the tally for you: tap a dot for each line, pick a 21, 33 or 45 day run, and nothing resets if you miss a day.

A 369 method example

An illustration of the format, not anyone’s real entry: “Thank you, I’m so glad I walked into my driving test calm and drove the route the way I practiced it.” It names a moment you will live through and a part you can influence, whereas “he texts me tonight” puts the whole outcome in someone else’s hands. Some Reddit posters this year split it up instead: the desire 3 times, the feeling 6 and the reason 9. Another built a week-long challenge around it because one line repeated 18 times had started to feel mechanical.

Tesla 369: what Nikola Tesla actually wrote about the number three

It rests on one real habit and one unsourced line. In “My Inventions,” serialized in Electrical Experimenter in 1919, Tesla describes counting his steps and working out the volume of soup plates and cups. “All repeated acts or operations I performed had to be divisible by three,” he wrote, and if he missed, he felt he had to start again, “even if it took hours.” The archived text describes a compulsion he lived with; it has no 6, no 9 and nothing about wishes.

The famous line, the one calling 3, 6 and 9 a “key to the universe,” is a different matter. A 2021 Truth or Fiction fact-check traced it back through blogs, Goodreads and Quora to roughly 2009 and concluded it had not been “credibly attributed to Nikola Tesla.” We searched the 1919 text and didn’t find it either.

The trio of numbers is older than the quote, and it isn’t Tesla’s. In 1893, Clara Bloomfield-Moore’s book on the inventor John Keely reported that his instrument was “set on thirds, sixths, and ninths, to get the best effects” (archive.org scan). Keely’s claims were never independently verified, and he is now generally regarded as a fraud.

Where the 369 manifestation method came from: a dated timeline

  1. Keely’s “thirds, sixths, and ninths” appear in print. The earliest 3-6-9 grouping we could verify.
  2. Tesla’s “divisible by three” passage, the only statement on the number in his own words that we found.
  3. The “3, 6 and 9” quote gets pinned on Tesla online. Author unknown.
  4. Karin Yee’s Choosing Gratitude channel posts “How To Use Nikola Tesla Divine Code 369 to Manifest Anything You Want.” An archived copy shows 227,217 views by 2 November. Earliest dated version found, not proof of first.
  5. The date on Yee’s blog post, where she writes: “A few months ago I was inspired to create this method. I call it Tesla Code 369 method.”
  6. US searches jump from almost nothing to roughly 37,000 to 39,000 a month (Ahrefs estimates), still the all-time peak. A Reddit claim of a March 2020 breakout doesn’t fit that curve.
  7. The earliest TikTok video our search found: a creator trying the method publicly, now at 2.5 million plays.
  8. The #369method hashtag page shows 88.2 million views in an archived capture. A year later, 183.1 million.
  9. Laura Galebe, the creator linked to the lucky girl syndrome trend, posts about the 369 method (2.4 million plays).
  10. Searches peak every June and July, rising from about 8,200 to about 10,000 a month.
  11. #369method stands at 812.5 million views from 57,252 creators, in our TikTok API pull.

How people use the 369 method for manifestation today

Mostly for one person. Of 114 Reddit posts about the method we read from mid-July to early October 2026, about half concerned a specific person: an ex, a crush, a partner who pulled away. Exams, money and jobs came next. More than 40% mentioned subliminals alongside it, and others add scripting or the whisper method, so 369 is rarely anyone’s only practice. Tesla came up in just 2 of the 114 posts, though TikTok captions still tag #nikolatesla.

The questions are mostly about rules: phone or paper, which tense, all 18 lines in one sitting or not. One poster who forgot the afternoon round joked in their title that they were now on the 368 method, while asking, more seriously, whether they’d ruined it. That worry turns up again and again, along with checking for signs. At least one person gave up after 8 to 10 days because the writing had become draining.

Does the 369 method work? What psychology says

No one has tested it. Our October 2026 search of the OpenAlex index found no peer-reviewed study of the 369 method, so what follows is adjacent research that never measures whether a wish comes true.

Repeating a positive sentence

In Wood, Perunovic and Lee (2009), people with low self-esteem who repeated “I’m a lovable person” ended up feeling worse, and the authors wrote that such statements may “backfire for the very people who ‘need’ them the most.” Then Flynn and Bordieri (2020) ran two replications with about 225 and 237 participants. Neither found any difference between the affirmation group and its comparison (no statement in one study, values writing in the other), whatever people’s self-esteem. So: no dependable mood benefit, and a harm finding that is contested, not settled.

What happens if you miss a day of the 369 method?

Habit research answers this one. In Lally and colleagues’ 2010 study, 96 volunteers repeated one behavior daily; the time to reach their plateau of automaticity ranged from 18 to 254 days. In the authors’ words, “Missing one opportunity to perform the behaviour did not materially affect the habit formation process.” It’s about habits, not wishes, yet it knocks out the idea that a skipped round resets anything. The real strength of 3-6-9 may be that it hangs a pause on three moments you never miss.

Writing about a specific person

Gabriele Oettingen and Doris Mayer’s 2002 studies included students with a crush. Those who judged a good outcome likely put in more effort, while those who mostly enjoyed vivid fantasies of it did worse over time. Eighteen idealized lines a day about one person sits closer to the fantasy side.

Can you write a wish until you believe it? What philosophy says

Much 369 advice assumes enough repetition turns a hope into a belief. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’s entry on doxastic voluntarism separates deciding to believe something directly, which is widely doubted, from practices that shift belief indirectly over time, which can work but unreliably. It works through Pascal’s famous advice to a doubter: act as believers do, take the holy water, and belief may follow.

The 369 method is a small modern version of that wager. Eighteen lines a day may change how the sentence feels to you. It can’t change the odds in the world, and the entry’s own example is someone who does everything Pascal advises and still may not end up believing. Someone on Reddit copying the line all day while their mind says otherwise isn’t failing at the method. They’ve hit a limit philosophers already described.

Critics and debates about the 369 method

Fact-checkers object to the Tesla branding. Insiders object too: law-of-assumption voices on Reddit say techniques manifest nothing and only a changed self-image does, while at least one coach ranking for the term warns that repeating a wish from need deepens the sense of lack. One former practitioner described journals full of 369 pages for an ex, and the relief of finally stopping.

The main peer-reviewed study of manifestation belief adds a harder note. Dixon, Hornsey and Hartley surveyed 1,023 people across three studies and found that over a third endorsed manifestation beliefs. Higher scorers saw themselves as more successful and aimed higher, but they were also more drawn to risky investments, more likely to have been bankrupt and more likely to expect fast, unlikely success. The data are correlational, so they show no cause.

MurMur’s view: when the 369 method helps, and when to stop

We read the 369 method as a reminder system with a myth attached. Three anchors a day keep a wish in view, and if your sentence points at your own next step, that step may get taken. That’s all we’ll claim. It comes with no promise of money, a recovery or a person, and if something didn’t arrive, a missed round or a doubtful thought is not the reason.

Stop, or loosen it, if any of these sound familiar:

  • You feel dread at lunchtime because you might forget the six.
  • The writing is about someone who has said no or gone quiet. Their choices belong to them.
  • You’re writing about an exam instead of revising for it, or about money instead of making a plan.
  • It sits on top of a breakup or anxiety that makes ordinary days hard. A friend, a counselor or a doctor is the better next step.

To keep the rhythm, try swapping the eighteen lines for one if-then plan; see implementation intentions for the research. For long-shot wishes, what delulu means covers where hope helps and fantasy stalls. Wider evidence is in is manifestation real?, gentler writing ideas in our manifestation journal prompts. Related glossary entries: affirmation and self-concept affirmations, plus our free affirmation generator for gentler lines.

369 method FAQ: questions people ask

Did Nikola Tesla create the 369 method?

No. Tesla wrote in 1919 that his repeated acts had to be divisible by three, and nothing about 6, 9 or wishing. The writing schedule first appears, as far as we can date it, in an October 2019 YouTube video by coach Karin Yee, who says she created it.

What happens if you miss a day of the 369 method?

Nothing breaks. In a 2010 study of habit formation, missing one chance to do the behavior didn’t materially affect how the habit formed. Pick it up at the next round, or stop if it has become a source of worry.

How many days should you do the 369 method?

Karin Yee suggested 33 or 45 days; later teachers say 21. None of those numbers comes from research, and in Lally’s habit study the time for a daily behavior to reach about 95% of its eventual automaticity ranged from 18 to 254 days.

Can you do the 369 method on your phone?

Yes. The method has no official rulebook, and paper-only is a community preference. Some people find handwriting slower and more deliberate, which is a fine reason to choose it, but typing breaks nothing.

Sources we opened for this page: N. Tesla, “My Inventions,” Part I, Electrical Experimenter (February 1919), archived edition. C. Bloomfield-Moore, Keely and His Discoveries: Aerial Navigation (London, 1893). K. Yee, Choosing Gratitude, “How To Use Nikola Tesla Divine Code 369 to Manifest Anything You Want” (YouTube, October 5, 2019; Wayback capture November 2, 2019) and “How I Manifested $10,165.46 with Nikola Tesla Code 369 Method” (blog, dated January 14, 2020). K. LaCapria, “Nikola Tesla ‘369 Theory’,” Truth or Fiction (August 3, 2021). J. V. Wood, W. Q. E. Perunovic and J. W. Lee, “Positive self-statements: Power for some, peril for others,” Psychological Science 20, no. 7 (2009): 860–866. M. K. Flynn and M. J. Bordieri, “On the failure to replicate past findings regarding positive affirmations and self-esteem,” Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 16 (2020): 49–61. P. Lally, C. H. M. van Jaarsveld, H. W. W. Potts and J. Wardle, “How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world,” European Journal of Social Psychology 40, no. 6 (2010): 998–1009. G. Oettingen and D. Mayer, “The motivating function of thinking about the future: Expectations versus fantasies,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, no. 5 (2002): 1198–1212. L. J. Dixon, M. J. Hornsey and N. Hartley, “‘The Secret’ to success? The psychology of belief in manifestation,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 51, no. 1 (2025; online 2023): 49–65. M. Boespflug and E. Jackson, “Doxastic Voluntarism,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2024). Search figures are Ahrefs US estimates; Reddit counts come from the SniffSub index; TikTok counts come from archived hashtag pages and the TikHub API, pulled October 11, 2026. This page is an editorial summary, not medical, financial or clinical advice.